Tuesday, July 10, 2012

WikiLeaks: CIA Disinformation Psy-Op? Why It's Important to Question Everything

(Skip to links)

Firstly, try to remember that one who lives for the truth must always keep an open mind and think clearly. It's always easier, and thus tempting, to get caught up in "group-think"; a group you "relate" to has one viewpoint, therefore you believe it must be your view as well. This group-think has always been the downfall of humanity, as sadistic leaders have always been able to take advantage of it to manipulate the masses. Unfortunately, with advances in science & thought, this manipulation has only become easier to accomplish. In a world where the youth (in particular) grow up on TV, internet, and chemical poisoning (junk food, etc.), the brain is mushed into apathy, which leads to an inner, desperate need for a sense of purpose. Taking advantage of this, the "powers-that-be" presented their puppet Obama: the perfect leader of hope and change the masses could latch onto AS their sense of purpose. Anyone with half a brain has seen the only "change" has been to make things even worse, and the only hope is for those with all the power and money.

As people slowly woke up to seeing Obama for what he really is, they started working their dormant minds and expressing dissent, thus becoming a problem for those who'd prefer us stay sheep. With Obama mostly used up they needed another patsy, another glorified leader to distract and misdirect the masses (especially the mostly young/liberal crowd of the internet). Enter WikiLeaks and Julian Assange.

Now wait: I'm not against free speech or whistleblowers - quite the contrary in fact - but one must always question the validity of information. Question everything. So take a deep breath and set your emotions aside for a moment. Let's ask some simple questions to help pry open your mind:

  • Isn't it strange how quickly WikiLeaks became so popular, spread like wildfire across the media owned by the very corporations that would be against the truth coming out?
  • Why has the US, who has always been able to "disappear" those they wish to dispose of so readily, allowed Assange to live in luxury while an indefinite "investigation" goes on, while Bradley Manning has from day one been confined to a cell (also without trial)?
  • If he was really so dangerous to Western governments, why is Assange allowed to speak freely, yet no one is even allowed inside to talk to Manning?
  • Why has WikiLeaks constantly gone after the enemies of the West (Russia, China, Iran, Syria, etc.) whilst revealing practically nothing of substance [that wasn't already widely known] regarding allies of the West?
  • Why has Assange come out and said he didn't want to leak anything to damage Israel, one of the most on-record human-rights abusers? Are truth-seekers supposed to pick and choose?
  • Why has Assange vilified those trying to get the truth about 9/11 when, at the very least, there are a thousand unanswered questions regarding the incident?
  • Why would WikiLeaks come out with "information" supporting the American government's assertion that Iraq had WMDs when EVERYONE now knows that to be a huge lie?
  • Why does just about everything WikiLeaks & Assange say/leak happen to fall in line with the propaganda of the West?
  • Possibly the biggest question: why, when Assange himself has attacked the mainstream media, does WikiLeaks let the very same corporately-owned media PICK & CHOOSE WHAT TO REPORT TO THE WORLD, thus allowing obvious censorship?

I'm sure Assange is likely innocent of the rape allegations that were thrown on him, but as touched on previously, the Western "powers-that-be" aren't trying very hard to silence him. They let him speak freely, even regularly appear on TV, whilst sitting in a comfy mansion of a British man whose connections with British intelligence is in question. Cries of "Free Assange, he's innocent!" permeate every outlet of media, thus helping to glorify Assange, grooming him as the martyr of truth and freedom.

Whilst Bradley Manning, on the other hand, doesn't see the light of day. Without trial. True, there are many who call for his freedom too, but these calls tend to get lost in the cacophony of voices exalting and genuflecting for their leader Assange.

Of course the CIA (and others assigned to control the flow of information/disinformation) wouldn't rely solely on WikiLeaks to shape public opinion. Remember how it came out that Sabu, leader of LulzSec, was working with the FBI? LulzSec merged into Anonymous, which merged with WikiLeaks. Though I believe the Occupy and perhaps Anonymous movements started out legitimately by people with true concern for the world, it has been infiltrated to the core, with accounts like @YourAnonNews and others who magically get a million followers overnight, spouting pro-NATO propaganda, constantly attacking the West's enemies, with only the occasional sprinkle of cries of concern for legit problems like bringing down the Fed (and those sprinkles usually late, watered down, or focused on less urgent/important issues). Same with WikiLeaks who has mainly gone after Russia, China, Syria, and Iran, all enemies of the West, while more or less offering no real revelations about any Western ally.

On that same note, remember when LulzSec (especially Sabu) constantly refused to release "hacked" information until they had gone through and censored the information "for the safety of others"? WikiLeaks has also used this as their excuse. Then it comes out that WikiLeaks has, and continues to, give all their information to the corporate media to censor and publish, who send it to the CIA/FBI to censor as well! Does this sound like something truth-seekers and whistleblowers, whose only concern is freedom of information and exposing dangerous secrets, would do?

And this is only the beginning of the questions we should ponder before buying into WikiLeaks. Below are some great resources regarding the subject I strongly encourage all to view.


Nihilists of The World Unite: Wikileaks Is The “Cognitive Infiltration” Operation Demanded by Cass Sunstein
Tarpley presents some GREAT evidence that WikiLeaks is CIA-controlled disinformation.

Wikileaks' Assange: Defying Common Sense
"The corporate owned media releasing the Wikileaks publicly - do so with a great amount of spin, distortion, careful timing, and irresponsible representations. They are overtly and continuously abusing the cables in a globalist-serving manner. One must wonder why Assange, seeking transparency and to balance an equation he claims as unjust, has "partnered" as he calls it, with the very ones who have done the unbalancing and obfuscating of transparency all along."

Sex, Lies, Iran, Israel & WikiLeaks (Video)
"If WikiLeaks didn’t exist, the CIA and Mossad might have been tempted to invent it."

Cass Sunstein, Wikileaks And The Public Right To Know
"Is it a conspiracy too far to suggest that Wikileaks, through no fault of Assange, has been the victim of Cass Sunstein and the Obama administration's plot to 'cognitively infiltrate online social networks' to 'bolster the Government's messaging (on the grounds that those who don't believe government sources will be more inclined to listen to 'those who appear independent while secretly acting on behalf of the Government')? Am I being a wild-eyed conspiracy theorist to ponder (publicly) whether or not the leaking of documents that expose US government spying at the UN etc. is, to the US government, worth the price in embarrassment if it directs public awareness to relatively safe conspiracies and thereby prevents a real grass-roots and therefore out of control (from the elite's perspective) rebellion based on the public's awareness of much more serious government crimes?"

Book: Julian Assange Held Back Wikileaks About U.S., Israel (Video)
"People on both sides of the argument have been quick to rush to judgement on the motivations of Wikileaks’ Julian Assange. Moral crusader or compromised egotist? In a new book about Assange written by the Guardian journalists with whom he worked closely, Assange is quoted as saying that negative cables concerning the United States and Israel were deliberately omitted from initial Wikileaks releases last year to prevent the organization being stereotyped as anti-American.
'We shouldn’t go exposing, for example Israel, during the initial phase…the exposure of these other bad countries (Russia, Arab countries) will set the tone of American public opinion,' Assange is quoted as saying in the book."

"Assange: 'I’m constantly annoyed that people are distracted by false conspiracies such as 9/11, when all around we provide evidence of real conspiracies, for war or mass financial fraud.'"

Who is Behind Wikileaks?
WikiLeaks has some mighty suspicious connections. Many great questions need to be asked.

Wikileaks the new As Sahab
Ry Dawson points out evidence WikiLeaks is an Israeli ally & more.

The Wikileaks Word Frequency (Image)
Image showing "Iran" is the most frequent subject of WikiLeaks cables.

Wikileaks: A Big Dangerous US Government Con Job
"A closer look at the details, so far carefully leaked by the most ultra-establishment of international media such as the New York Times, reveals a clear agenda. That agenda coincidentally serves to buttress the agenda of US geopolitics around the world from Iran to Russia to North Korea. The Wikileaks is a big and dangerous US intelligence Con Job which will likely be used to police the Internet."

Julian Assange, Agent Provocateur
"This psy-ops trick does not conceal the policy failures, that cannot be done. What is actually happening here is a deliberate twist put on the facts..."

Wikileaks Is Zionist Poison
"Disinformation is defined as ‘misinformation that is deliberately disseminated in order to influence or confuse rivals.’ It is used by governments to mislead and brainwash their citizen populations, instigate wars, and blackmail foreign regimes. It is the ultimate instrument of the media. The most effective disinformation is that which is comprised of falsehood as well as facts. Wikileaks, founded by Julian Assange, fits this description perfectly, right down to the letter. Seemingly overnight, it has become one of the biggest ‘whistle-blowing’ agencies in modern history. In reality though, it is one of the biggest disinformation projects in modern history, and it may be the most dangerous because it is masquerading as an organization of truth. The information released by Wikileaks isn’t new; it isn’t groundbreaking; it doesn’t hurt the US as much as people think, it’s fractional really; and it is overloaded with as much as propaganda as the day-to-day Zionist media is. This propaganda is benefitting someone. And that someone is the illegal usurping entity of Israel. Even the Israeli government itself thinks so."

How WikiLeaks Keeps Its Funding Secret
"WikiLeaks's lack of financial transparency stands in contrast to the total transparency it seeks from governments and corporations."

Wikileaks leaks toxic acid in every direction, except to Israel
"Did you find any document among them that either creates difficulties for the government of the Zionist entity, or even slightly embarrasses it? Think about it well, you will find that the answer is a very simple “No”. Does it not strike you as interesting or remarkable, that many of the revelations about Middle East affairs are of direct benefit to Israel? If it hasn’t, read them again, and give it some thought."

Wikileaks - CIA's tool (Video)
Rafik Lutif explains his reasoning behind Wikileaks & CNN's sudden documentary on Homs.

Obvious Propaganda

Iran may regret promoting WikiLeaks now they have been implicated
An example of the pro-Israel, anti-Iran propaganda in which WikiLeaks specializes. Claiming Iran works with Al-Qaeda, when it's well-known the CIA established (and utilizes) Al-Qaeda.

Wikileaks confirms other ignored reports about Iraq WMDs
Another OBVIOUS bit of propaganda espoused by WikiLeaks: trying to say the claim of Iraq having WMDs was true, when even a monkey now knows otherwise.


The following links show WikiLeaks' anti-Syria (and again, pro-Israel/NATO) agenda, and expose it all as lies.

WikiLeaks “Syrian Files” Obtained by Flame to Set Up Assad
When “Wiki Leaks”. Assange Syria Papers:Cover-Up of the Continued Illegal War on Syria
Wikileaks Syria Emails - NATO's Final Media Card (Video)
Rethinking the Wikileaks’ Syria File
Bashshar’s email? Who is Sam@alshahba

History of Misinformation

Finally, don't forget we've been duped before, and the CIA has long-controlled what we see & hear.

LulzSec leader Sabu was working for us, says FBI

Operation Mockingbird: CIA Media Manipulation


  1. Why would Julian Assange interview Hezbollah's Hasan Nasrallah who are fighting the CIA backed Al Qaeda in Syria if he is a CIA asset?


    1. To appear neutral? All disinformation is best when they appear neutral, but slyly manipulate opinion a certain direction and refuse to teach certain topics (like Israel). For example, see Al-Jazeera. I have a ton more evidence Assange is suspicious but been too busy to add another post here, but I'm sure you can find. I'll post some here:

      Wikileaks helps West to justify attack on Syria: Analyst

      Manning ally: "The antics of Assange ... reflect negatively on us all"
      Key WikiLeaks supporter bashes Assange and triggers a rift among whistleblowers

      Busted - Wikileaks Working For Israel (Mossad Operation) - MUst Watch

      Wiki-Leaks or Wiki-Lies?

      WikiLeaks Syria file dump benefits CIA/NATO
      "WMR has learned from intelligence sources in France and Lebanon that Assange has long been co-opted by Israel's Mossad"

      Belfast interview with Assange, 19 July 2010: "I'm constantly annoyed that people are distracted by false conspiracies such as 9/11, when all around we provide evidence of real conspiracies, for war or mass financial fraud."

      Exclusive: Assange-Mossad ties unveiled

      WikiLeaks admits they caused no harm to the U.S. in any of their cables

      WIKILEAKS: Assange's Picture Gallery of "Useful Fools"

    2. Julian Assange has been detained on fake charges for 908 days. He gave airtime to the the most powerful enemy of the CIA and published the most devastating leaks on the planet including a video of a US helicopter gunship gunning down innocent journalists that changed the world.

      If that is all part of the plan I say you are unhinged.

      I put it to you that your conspiracy theory he is a CIA asset is infantile, poorly thought out lacks nuance and is fuled by a hatred of something trivial like blonde hair.

      The story is much much more complex and nuanced than a binary good and bad. Thus far Wikileaks and Julian Assange have been positive for those who want to change the world.

      The enemy are taking pot shots on the side. Anonymously. Unlike Julian and myself.

      Charles Frith. Bangkok. + 66 8 47 33 47 69

    3. He's been "detained" in a mansion... given plenty of publicity, a TV show, etc. Whereas Manning on the other hand...

      The "gunship" video was not new, only to those who weren't paying attention.

      Conspiracy theory? Funny coming from you, and I am simply trying to get people to think. They can form their own conclusions. And the accusation this has to do with him being blond hair? I hope that's a joke, because accusations of prejudice are usually the tactics of one who has run out of logic to discuss with.

      You're right, it is very complex. I don't know all the answers, but if you actually look into all this information you'd see that there is MUCH reason to be skeptical of Wikileaks/Assange, whether to support or disbelieve.

      "Unlike Julian and myself" as you take shots at me, and Julian has taken shots on tons of people in the "truth" movement. Are you hearing yourself?

      There is reason to suspect Assange, but there is reason to suspect & doubt most of the "popular" voices. HOWEVER, I do not advocate being automatically "against" these people or their information. Information is not biased; it is simply data. True data can come from all sources, thus I advocate taking in ALL information before sorting out what is right or wrong, or what you are unsure of, based on history, logic, wisdom & common sense.

      For example, I respect much of the information you share. Name-calling & throwing assumptions is simply divide&conquer. Cautioning people to think before they blindly worship/idolize/believe everything a source says is simply common sense.

  2. Julian Assange criticizing Israel in the NYT http://j.mp/17X6J3H while under ongoing detention for a year and prior to that house arresst for two years.

  3. So Assange has been an extremely popular "activist" for about 7 years, and it takes him those 7 years to say ONE thing about Israel, and the one thing is a soft "It avoids meaningful criticism of Israel"?? Wow, how courageous and informative of him.

    How many activists/revolutionaries/geopolitical informants that you know of, that don't make the frequent appearance in the mainstream media, talk so little criticism of Israel? You and I, any who know the imperialism behind Syria/Libya/etc., any who care about the genocide that is Palestine, anyone with a brain... we all criticize Israel, and frequently. It's not strange that after 7 years that's all Assange has said?

    Not to mention, even that very infinitesimal snub of Israel comes WAY too late. If you haven't noticed, it's become more "okay" to criticize Israel in the mainstream. Their recent attack on Palestine was the test ground for that.

    Regardless, you don't find it odd that the "activist of the decade" Assange has 99.9% left Israel, one of the greatest sins of the century, alone?
    You don't find it odd that Assange and Snowden are talked about at great length in the mainstream media, which, whether discussed negatively or no, was bound to have the effect of turning the two into heroic "idols" for the so-called activists of the world? How 99% of other whistleblowers go IGNORED, get their lives ACTUALLY ruined (if not "disappeared", end up with a "heart attack", wind up in a "mysterious" car accident, etc.)??

    The people in power are not idiots. Thus if something becomes popular, it's for a reason. If people are left to continue speaking to the public while kept, more or less, with a decent (if not luxurious) standard of living (Assange living in a mansion, Snowden living like a superhero) it's for a reason.

    Don't be fooled. Open your mind. Don't accept a conclusion until you are completely sure of something.

  4. Keep this page alive. Important info.

  5. Charles Frith is a fed. He trolls online for people who question the US governments fake whistleblowers, including Assange. This is literally his job.